Aviation Noise
HomeNoise NewsAviation NoiseSubscribeSpecial Reports

Headlines and Top Story- Updated November 17, 2017

NASA Tests Technologies to Reduce Airframe Noise 
- ACRP Examines Aircraft Noise Impacts on Student Learning, Offers Guidance
- Canada and Germany Cooperate on Developing Quieter Aircraft Cabins
- Acoustical Society of America to Showcase Latest Noise Research
- East Hampton to Pursue Part 161 Action to Curb Airport Noise
- Totonto Examines Best Airport Noise Management Practices
- Maryland to Sue FAA Over Noise from BWI International Airport 
- Lawmaker Seeks Report on Effects of Aviation Noise on Health
- Groups Sue FAA Over Noise from Air Tours Over Parks 


FAA Developing UAS Certification and
Measurement Criteria for Noise
In support of FAA’s development of noise certification and measurement criteria for unmanned aerial systems (UAS), the DOT’s John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center undertook research leading to a small, lightweight Global Navigation Satellite System-based tracking system, a noise certification test on a relatively large, fixed wing UAS, and continued testing and progress on a method of conducting noise tests on UAS.

The noise certification test on a Navmar TigerShark UAS was conducted according to CFR Title 14 Part 36 Appendix G, Take-off Noise Requirements for Propeller-Driven Small Airplane and Propeller-Driven, Commuter Category Airplane Certification Tests. “The TigerShark did not meet the Appendix G standard, we believe primarily because the aircraft was not optimized for low noise operations,” the Volpe report concludes.

Volpe staff also conducted flight and noise tests on their inhouse UAS vehicles, postulating that annoyance might be a function of the individual vehicle operational mode. They made these recommendations:

• FAA should continue to fund the development of the Volpe tracking system so that the system can be utilized in future UAS noise tests, with a focus on improving the software usability to work with intended applications more efficiently and effectively in the field; 

• FAA and Volpe should expand the number of vehicles tested, particularly those near the 55 pound cutoff, to determine if this weight limit is adequate to protect the public from undue UAS noise;

• FAA should consider developing a set of recommendations to UAS manufacturers, encouraging them to include noise mitigation in their UAS design criteria; 

• FAA should engage with psychoacoustic subject matter experts from Volpe, NASA, NPS, other federal agencies, and academia to determine which metrics adequately represent the human response to the noise characteristics of different UAS modes of operation.

“Accurate position information of the UAS during noise testing is important for assuring the quality of the test results,” according to Volpe’s report to FAA, the agency that sponsored the research. “The tracking system developed by Volpe allows for various levels of accuracy depending on the system configuration and latency/real-time data requirements. The system can achieve accuracy to the subfoot level with post-processing. [It] has been refined through inhouse UAS vehicle tests but has not yet been optimized for field campaigns in a noise measurement environment.”

Copyright 2017 Great Circle Communications LLC 
No unauthorized posting, forwarding, or any other form of transmission of this material, by any means, in whole or in part, is allowed.   


For a free sample copy of Noise Regulation Report and to learn how you can get your free copy of our exclusive
Special Report, Guide to Airport Noise Programs,
with unlimited access to more than 300 airport, agency, and organiztion noise programs,
including Part 150 and Part 161 studies- a $150 value- call (215) 469-6816.